History has offered many examples of how capital move from one city to another, forming a pattern of shifting global financial power. While incumbents and the challengers could be miles apart, two principles guide the formation of global financial capital: “stability” and “openness”. This article draws examples from modern history to extrapolate critical building blocks of global financial centers.
History of Financial Centers
In the competition among global financial centers, London used to be evenly matched with New York and has more than once topped the Global Financial Centers Index by think tank Z/Yen Group.
However, since Brexit in 2016, London has consistently fallen behind New York and has even found its position as the European financial capital threatened. In the index released in March 2020, London’s score plunged by 31 points, the largest drop among the top 20 Western European financial centers.
Hong Kong was also affected by its anti-extradition movement: its score dropped by 34 points, and its global position slid from third to sixth, lagging behind Tokyo, Singapore, and Shanghai by a small margin.
Source: Global Financial Center Index 27, via https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-publications/global-financial-centres-index-27/
The index, by all means, is not perfect, but there are many precedents of politics affecting financial centers’ global standing. Today’s regional financial centers, such as Frankfurt and Shanghai, might become tomorrow’s global financial centers. From Italian city-states (Venice and Genoa) to Amsterdam, and from London to New York, the appellation of global financial capital has shifted throughout history.
In fact, the shift follows a historical pattern. Apart from the region’s importance in the global trading system and the city’s physical infrastructure, a city with a strong and stable central bank has a natural advantage in becoming a global financial center, given the interwoven nature of the financial sector, its regulations and local authorities.
The city’s openness to global capitalism and culture would also determine how far it can grow its financial sector. The US and the UK’s increasing tendency towards Western populism and Hong Kong’s accelerating drift away from liberalism both seem to signal another reshuffle of global financial centers.
Formation of Financial Clusters
The “reputation” of a financial center is often mentioned, and this seemingly vague criterion is actually a good indication of the local government and agencies’ familiarity with the financial sector. Disputes over assets and conflicts of interest make the financial sector a highly sensitive sector, with additional legal checks and regulations. Unlike other industry clusters, the financial sector cluster tends to be in capital cities, so as to facilitate bureaucratic processes, to interpret policy directions, and to have better access to regulatory bodies.
The UK is a good example. While Lloyds Banking Group and Midland Bank (now merged with HSBC) were established in Birmingham, they were later headquartered in London. Apart from operational needs and cluster theory (proposed by US academic Michael Porter), this was because the Bank of England was also in London.
Another example is New York. While it was already an important trading port when the United States of America was founded, in the early 19th century and even before the Civil War of 1861 to 1865, the US financial center was located in Philadelphia, which was considered to be the country’s de facto first capital. The Philadelphia-based Second Bank of the United States (also known as BUS) was endowed with central bank responsibilities and authority, but it was in fact not owned by the federal government.
On the grounds of corruption and obstruction of state sovereignty, the seventh US President Andrew Jackson (1829–1837) removed federal deposits in BUS and ended public duties of the bank in 1836. This began the “Free Banking Era” of 1837 to 1864, when the federal government transferred the monetary responsibilities to state governments.
New York, then a regional financial hub full of talented bankers, already had the US’s first stock exchange. More importantly, the New York government had prior experience regulating the financial sector. Apart from requiring banks to guarantee banknotes issued with market securities, the local regulators implemented rules and provided safeguards against the economic impact of chartered banks’ failures. New York was thus able to surpass Philadelphia, who had the first-mover advantage, and other contenders (e.g. Boston), to be financial institutions’ new favorite. In the early 20th century, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was the most influential among the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, allowing the city to become the undisputed financial capital of the US.
Although banks may start in various regions to cater to the demand for trade, trade is not the only condition relevant to the financial sector. Having seasoned and cooperative local authorities is also crucial in building a financial center.
Stability: Foundation to Attracting Capital
If cooperation with regulators is the foundation of financial centers, then the “upper limit” to internationalizing the financial center is determined by the local political environment, economic factors and stability provided by the rule of law. The city must also be able to maintain an open attitude towards global capital and foreign culture.
The financial sector may be good at calculating risks, but it is unable to deal with unknown uncertainties. Any kind of extreme policies, uninterpretable laws, economic instability or social unrest may jeopardize the permanence of financial institutions. Thus, a steady but robust business environment is the primary condition for building a financial center.
In fact, following the 2008 financial crisis, if the US did not propose appropriate measures to prevent history from repeating itself, New York’s financial status might have been in question as well. Similarly, if the US Federal Reserve did not coordinate with the banks during the numerous financial crises, there would have been more capital flight from New York.
From the perspective of policy planning and regulatory supervision, the key to building a successful financial center is not loosening banking regulations unconditionally but rather, adopting appropriate recommendations from financial institutions. This explains why banks congregated in New York and London. Instead of relaxing regulations, there must be good communication between the government and the financial players in order for financial centers to flourish.
From a market stability point of view, it is certainly not accidental that many global financial centers are located in cities of large economies. Apart from large and deep markets and the potential for client development, the size of the country’s economy also determines the liquidity and credibility of its currency. If the economy is small, even if it is well-developed and highly open, should its currency turn international, it could bring about unnecessary capital risks to the country. This does not mean that small economies cannot become international financial centers: innovative monetary policies could foster a robust local economy and a stable financial market simultaneously.
Taking Singapore as an example, aside from emphasizing the rule of law, its late founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew was deeply influenced by the concept of an “Asian capital market”. Although Singapore does not have a large economy to support its currencies, it separates its Singaporean dollar assets from its foreign currency assets, successfully maintaining the stability of the domestic economy while making Singapore the transit point for international financial instruments.
Openness: Globalization is a One-Way Road
Globalization has a great impact on the financial sector. To promote the free flow of capital, global financial centers must create business environments that connect with other markets easily. Therefore, openness is also a necessary condition for establishing international financial centers. 17th century Netherlands was relatively tolerant to foreign cultures and religions in comparison to other European states. Because of this tolerance, Amsterdam became home to pagans all around Europe, a cultural melting pot, and gathering place for businessmen.
In addition, the Dutch Republic had just overthrown Spanish dictatorship, and society valued individual freedoms and independence, to a certain degree, from the control of the king and the pope. This business environment allowed capitalism to thrive: the world’s first modern stock market was established in Amsterdam in 1602, following the founding of Dutch East India Company. Although the Dutch Golden Age ended in war, Amsterdam’s free business spirit reappeared in New York when immigrants left Amsterdam for the new world. New York embarked on the journey to become the trading capital of the world much earlier than it had become a British colony.
Similarly, at the peak of globalization today, financial centers must embrace multiculturalism and attract talents of all kinds. As Asia gradually becomes home to global finance, European and American markets must gain a deeper understanding of the Eastern markets. Conversely, Asian markets must also attract talents familiar with traditional financial markets to ensure a smooth transition from the old to the new.
In the early 20th century, London had not recovered from the First World War while New York had not matured as a new global financial center. Starved with leadership, the global financial market crashed into the Great Depression in the 1930s.
Today, populism plagues the West, and anti-liberal movements proliferate in the East as a result of a surge in nationalism. On this trajectory, it seems increasingly difficult — or perhaps even impossible in the long term — for global financial centers, such as London and Hong Kong, to continue fulfilling the two requisites of “stability” and “openness”. History seems to be advancing the reshuffling of the global financial centers once again.
The article was originally published on Singapore’s Lianhe Zaobao and ThinkChina: https://www.thinkchina.sg/reshuffle-global-financial-centres-cardsThe English version was first translated by Candice Chan and Grace Chong. Minor edits have been made on this version for clarification purposes.
About the article
This article has been compiled by the author/s mentioned above and published by him/her via the EDHEC Student Finance Club (“Club” or “ESFC”) platform. The club confirms that the author/s is an active member at the time this article is published but emphasizes the fact that opinions and views given by the author/s in this article are his/her own views. ESFC takes no responsibility for the completeness or correctness of information provided. No investment advice is given with the text above and the reader should not take any financial position based on the information published in this article. The Club recommends extensive research by the reader before investing in any financial asset.
The article may be based on the information extracted from various sources including but not limited to various companies’ and statistical agencies’ websites, online portals, third-party research, annual reports etc.
No representation or warranty of any kind is or may be made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of, and no representation or warranty should be inferred from, any projections or futuristic statement contained herein or any underlying assumptions.
This article may include descriptions, statements, estimates and projections/futuristic statements with respect to current and anticipated performance of the underlying.
Such statements, estimates and projections reflect various assumptions and best estimates made by the participants concerning anticipated results, whose assumptions and estimates may or may not prove to be accurate or correct. There are no assurances whatsoever that any statements, estimates or projections contained in this article, including without limitation any financial or business projections, accurately present in all material respects the underlying’s financial and/or business position as of the respective dates specified and the results of its operations for any respective periods indicated.
No copyright or trademark infringement is intended in any form.
© Copyright 2021. EDHEC Student Finance Club